Sunday, March 20, 2016

Dr. Melba Ketchum Provides Evidence Her Work Was Not Contaminated!


From the desk of Dr. Melba Ketchum: "Okay this is the video everybody's been waiting for! This video is to show how wee knew we did not have contamination whenever we did the Sasquatch Genome Project, when we did the paper. We're gonna talk a little bit about the peer reviews and how they kept saying that the samples had to have been contaminated and so rejected the paper on those grounds. And then we're going to show you how we could determine with multiple types of testing that there was no contamination in the samples and I'm going to show you actual data and some data that I had to actually put together to show contamination since our samples weren't contaminated. So we'll go through each of these slides and I'll explain a little about it." Video after the jump!

Dr. Ketchum provides an excellent video detailing her hard work and her methods proving that Sasquatch is real. We applaud her efforts and wish more scientists took the brave stand on the subject of Sasquatch!




 

3 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Besides this being 2 years old, Why were human templates used with each sample, resulting in human DNA regardless of what the actual samples came from????
    Example: Test dog DNA using human templates you will get human results at 95.5% when the actually true result is 99.9% dog
    Dr.Haskell Hart & Dr.Todd Disotell explains this clearly.
    So were they wrong and Melba the veterinarian right???. I'm curious and confused

    ReplyDelete
  3. Besides this being 2 years old, Why were human templates used with each sample, resulting in human DNA regardless of what the actual samples came from????
    Example: Test dog DNA using human templates you will get human results at 95.5% when the actually true result is 99.9% dog
    Dr.Haskell Hart & Dr.Todd Disotell explains this clearly.
    So were they wrong and Melba the veterinarian right???. I'm curious and confused

    ReplyDelete